Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Undra Bailey

Other Cook County, Illinois exonerations with no crime
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/PublishingImages/Cook_County_seal.jpg
On May 23, 2008, 21-year-old Undra Bailey was arrested in Chicago, Illinois and charged with aggravated unlawful use of a firearm.

On June 30, 2008, Bailey pled guilty in Cook County Circuit Court and was sentenced to three years in prison.

In September 2013, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in People v. Aguilar that the portion of the statute under which Bailey had been convicted was unconstitutional. The statute said that a person committed the offense of aggravated unlawful use of a weapon when a person “carries on or about his person or in any vehicle or concealed on or about his person except when on his land or in his abode or fixed place of business any pistol, revolver, stun gun or taser or other firearm and the firearm is uncased, loaded and immediately accessible.”

The court held that this portion of the statute violated the right to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second Amendment.

In 2021, Bailey filed a motion to vacate the conviction based on the Aguilar ruling. After the motion was granted on December 3, 2021, the conviction on the gun charge was vacated, and the case was dismissed. By that time, Bailey was serving a 28-year prison term after being convicted of second-degree murder for a shooting in 2016.

On April 27, 2002, Cook County Circuit Court Judge Erica Reddick granted Bailey a certificate of innocence. Bailey then filed a claim seeking compensation from the Illinois Court of Claims.

– Maurice Possley

Report an error or add more information about this case.

Posting Date: 11/1/2022
Last Updated: 11/1/2022
State:Illinois
County:Cook
Most Serious Crime:Weapon Possession or Sale
Additional Convictions:
Reported Crime Date:2008
Convicted:2008
Exonerated:2022
Sentence:3 years
Race/Ethnicity:Black
Sex:Male
Age at the date of reported crime:21
Contributing Factors:
Did DNA evidence contribute to the exoneration?:No