Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Willie Donald

Other Indiana Exonerations with Official Misconduct
On February 27, 1992, there were six armed robberies in Gary, Indiana’s Glen Park neighborhood. One of them ended with the murder of 30-year-old Bernard Jimenez, who was gunned down when he fought back against the robber.

Jimenez was arriving home with his wife, Kimerly Belinsky and their daughters, ages 1, 6 and 7 when a man carrying a handgun appeared and grabbed the 7-year-old and demanded money. Belinsky said that her husband put the cash from his wallet—less than $20—on the ground and told the robber to go into the house and take whatever he wanted. The robber picked up the money, but when he saw how little there was, he contemptuously threw it back down and said, “You don’t value your family.” He then pointed his gun at their one-year-old daughter’s face.

At that point, Jimenez threw a small wooden picnic table at the robber and they struggled. The robber fatally shot Jimenez and then fled.

On March 3, Gary police put together a photographic lineup that included the photograph of 23-year-old Willie Donald, who lived in the area. Belinsky pointed to Donald’s photo and said she was “not sure,” but that she believed he was the gunman. A police report said, “She also states that if she saw him in a lineup that she could point him out.” That same day, Rhonda Williams, who had been robbed of $50 by a gunman who forced his way into her home, also picked Donald as the man who robbed her. Both witnesses had previously said the gunman had acne scars on his face and both picked Donald, even though he had no acne scars.

Belinsky and Williams viewed a live lineup that same day and both picked out Donald. The other four armed robbery victims viewed a live lineup and none of them selected Donald.

Donald was charged with first-degree murder and two counts of armed robbery.

Donald went to trial in Lake County Circuit Court in June 1992. No physical or forensic evidence connected him to either crime. Williams and Belinsky both identified Donald as the gunman.

Donald’s oldest sister, Sheila, and her future husband, Dan Hopkins, testified that during the night of the crimes, Donald was car shopping with them in Merrillville and Crown Point, Indiana. Car salesmen testified that the three were at their dealerships at the same time of day as the crimes occurred, but none of the dealership employees could verify that they were there on the same day as the crime.

On June 12, 1992, the jury convicted Donald of first-degree murder and two counts of armed robbery. He was sentenced to 60 years in prison.

About a year later, the defense discovered that not long after the crime and before Donald was arrested, Williams called police and reported she saw the man who robbed her on the street. At the time Williams made the call, police were at Donald’s workplace examining his time cards for the day of the crimes and Donald was present.

That information became the basis for a post-conviction motion to vacate Donald’s conviction because the prosecution had failed to disclose the information prior to trial. But the motion and Donald’s subsequent appeals were denied.

Beginning in 2006, many years after Donald’s appeals had been rejected, the Medill Innocence Project at Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism and later the Chicago Innocence Center re-investigated Donald’s case.

Evidence was located that showed that an 18-year-old street gang member, Lavelle Thompson, who had facial acne, was murdered shortly after the robberies and murder of Jimenez.

In 2009, Jimenez's jacket was subjected to DNA testing to determine if any hair on the jacket could be linked to Thompson, but the test results were negative.

Also in 2009, Rhonda Williams provided a sworn statement saying that at the time she viewed the photographic lineup, she was with Kimerly Belinsky. Williams said she pointed to Donald’s photograph and Belinsky began to weep. However, a police officer noted in a report that Belinsky was not completely sure of her identification of Donald.

Williams also said in the statement that when she viewed the live lineup, she told the detective that Donald was bigger and taller than the robber. However, the detective assured her that Donald was the robber and that Donald had been arrested across the street from Williams’ home. She said the detective “convinced me that I had picked the right guy.”

Williams also said she never told prosecutors about her reservations or the detective’s statements to coerce her to identify Donald. And she said that she remained convinced that the man she saw shortly after the robbery (when police were at Donald’s workplace) was the gunman who robbed her.

Williams testified to her doubts and the police detective’s effort to persuade her during a sworn deposition given in 2013 as part of a post-conviction proceeding to vacate Donald’s testimony.

On January 25, 2016, a Lake County Circuit Court Judge vacated Donald’s convictions and granted him a new trial. The judge noted that the prosecution contended that the same man had committed both crimes and had argued that the identifications of Donald were positive and without any reservations. The judge ruled that the prosecution failure to disclose Williams’ reservations about her identification as well as the detective’s effort to persuade her to identify Donald rendered Donald’s trial constitutionally unfair.

On January 27, 2016, the Lake County State’s Attorney dismissed the charges and Donald was released.

After Indiana enacted a law in 2019 enabling wrongfully convicted defendants to seek compensation from the state, Donald filed a claim.

– Maurice Possley

Report an error or add more information about this case.

Posting Date: 2/9/2016
Last Updated: 5/28/2022
Most Serious Crime:Murder
Additional Convictions:Robbery
Reported Crime Date:1992
Sentence:60 years
Age at the date of reported crime:23
Contributing Factors:Mistaken Witness ID, Official Misconduct
Did DNA evidence contribute to the exoneration?:No