Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Brian Piszczek

Other Ohio Cases with Mistaken Witness Identifications
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/PublishingImages/Cuyahoga_County.jpg
Brian Piszczek was convicted in Cuyahoga County, Ohio, in 1991 of rape, felonious assault, and burglary. The victim was home alone and answered a knock at her door. When asked who he was, the perpetrator claimed to be a friend and the victim thought she recognized the voice. The assailant, after being let in, pulled a knife and cut the victim several times before raping her.
 
The victim, two months after the attack, identified Brian Piszczek from a photo lineup and subsequently identified him in court as the assailant. Piszczek's alibi could only be confirmed by his girlfriend and he had, in fact, been to the victim's house before with a mutual friend.
 
Piszczek's appeal failed, though it cited trial counsel for not seeking DNA testing of the evidence. The Innocence Project took over the case in the postconviction phase. The Innocence Project filed for release of the evidence in 1994. The request was granted and the evidence went to Forensic Science Associates.
 
FSA performed PCR based DNA testing on vaginal and anal swabs and a cutting from the victim's nightgown. Piszczek was excluded as the donor of all the samples. After receiving the results, the prosecution moved the court to overturn Piszczek's conviction, which happened in October 1994. Piszczek had spent four years in prison.  
 
In 1995, Piszczek was awarded $105,000 in state compensation.
 
Summary courtesy of the Innocence Project, http://www.innocenceproject.org/. Reproduced with permission.

Report an error or add more information about this case.

Posting Date:  Before June 2012
Last Updated: 10/10/2018
State:Ohio
County:Cuyahoga
Most Serious Crime:Sexual Assault
Additional Convictions:Assault, Burglary/Unlawful Entry
Reported Crime Date:1990
Convicted:1991
Exonerated:1994
Sentence:15 to 25 years
Race/Ethnicity:White
Sex:Male
Age at the date of reported crime:22
Contributing Factors:Mistaken Witness ID
Did DNA evidence contribute to the exoneration?:Yes