Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Harold Hall

Other California Cases with False Confessions
In June 1985, Nola Duncan and her brother David Rainey were murdered in Los Angeles, California. Police had no suspects until September 1985, when a jailhouse informant told the police that 37-year-old Harold Hall, in jail for an unrelated robbery, had confessed to the murders.

The informant provided the police with handwritten notes that he claimed he had exchanged with Hall in which Hall admitted to the murder.

Hall was then interrogated by police and confessed to the murders after being questioned for 17 hours without a break or access to an attorney. He later recanted his confession. No other evidence linked Hall to the murders.

In April 1990, a Los Angeles County Superior Court jury convicted Hall of murdering Duncan and Rainey, and of raping Duncan, and he was sentenced to life without parole. 
In April 1994, the convictions for Duncan’s rape and for Rainey’s murder were overturned by the Second District California Court of Appeal because of insufficient evidence, but the conviction for Duncan’s murder was upheld.

A few months later, the jailhouse informant recanted his statements and admitted to altering the notes to make Hall look guilty. The informant said he lied because he had hoped to receive leniency on a murder charge.

After experts confirmed that the notes had been partly erased, Hall filed a state law petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and in 1995, the trial court overturned his conviction and granted him a new trial.

The prosecution appealed, and in 1996, the Second District California Court of Appeal reversed the trial court’s decision and upheld Hall’s conviction. Hall continued to appeal his conviction, but was unsuccessful until September 2004, when the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit granted Hall’s federal habeas petition and ordered a new trial.

In August 2005, three days before Hall was scheduled to go to trial a second time, the prosecution dismissed the charges.
Hall then sued the City of Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Police Department and several police officers, alleging the defendants had used false evidence against him. Two years later, Hall unsuccessfully moved to amend the complaint to include a coerced confession claim. A District Court eventually found that Hall's unamended complaint had not raised triable issues of fact to support his fabrication-of-evidence claim.
In September 2012, a split panel of 9th Circuit judges revived his lawsuit, reversing the District Court and allowing him to amend the complaint. The lawsuit, however, later was dismissed.
- Stephanie Denzel

Report an error or add more information about this case.

Posting Date:  Before June 2012
Last Updated: 8/2/2017
County:Los Angeles
Most Serious Crime:Murder
Additional Convictions:Rape
Reported Crime Date:1985
Age at the date of reported crime:37
Contributing Factors:False Confession, Perjury or False Accusation, Official Misconduct
Did DNA evidence contribute to the exoneration?:No