The University of Michigan Law School

         The University of Michigan Law School
 
HomeClinical ProgramsHuman Trafficking CasesCase Display

Case View

 Case Documents

There are no documents to display for this case.

 Case Links - links to external documents

Link to Document

 
Case Details

  
CASE NAME:United States v. Beleal Garcia Gonzalez
ALL PLAINTIFFS:United States
ALL DEFENDANTS:Beleal Garcia Gonzalez, Elizabeth Mendez Vasquez, Maria Luisa Vasquez Garcia, Cesar Enrique Sarmiento Mendoza, Jenny Beatris Parada Ponce
CITATION:
DOCKET NUMBER:7:10-CR-00134
SOURCE:Bloomberg, News Article, US Attorney Website
TYPE OF CASE:Criminal
RELATED CASE CITATION:
TYPE OF TRIAL:Jury
TRIAL JUDGE(S):
YEAR OF ARREST:2010
YEAR OF VERDICT:2010
TYPE OF COURT:Federal
STATE:Texas
FEDERAL DISTRICT:Southern District Court
STATE COUNTY:McAllen
AGE OF VICTIM(S):Minor
NUMBER OF VICTIMS:3
GENDER OF VICTIM(S):Female
VICTIM'S COUNTRY OF ORIGIN:Honduras
METHOD OF ENTRY INTO THE U.S.:Unknown
WAS VICTIM CHARGED WITH A CRIME:No
NUMBER OF DEFENDANT(S):5
GENDER OF DEFENDANT(S):Female and Male
TYPE OF INDUSTRY:Labor and Sex
CASE CATEGORIZATION:Commercial Sexual Exploitation/Prostitution, Commercial Sexual Exploitation/Prostitution (johns/other buyers), Restaurant/Bar Industry
FIRST CHARGE:Sex trafficking of children
FIRST CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:18 U.S.C. § 1591(a)(1) and § 1591(b)(1)
FIRST CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
FIRST CHARGE SENTENCE:360
SECOND CHARGE:Bringing in and harboring an alien
SECOND CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:8 U.S.C. § 1324
SECOND CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
SECOND CHARGE SENTENCE:120
THIRD CHARGE:Reentry of removed aliens
THIRD CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:8 U.S.C. § 1326
THIRD CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Charge Dropped
THIRD CHARGE SENTENCE:
FOURTH CHARGE:
FOURTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FOURTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:
FOURTH CHARGE SENTENCE:
FIFTH CHARGE:
FIFTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FIFTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:
FIFTH CHARGE SENTENCE:
CORE TERMS:
SENTENCING OPINION CITATION:
LENGTH OF GREATEST SENTENCE:
RESTITUTION REQUIRED:
FINE IMPOSED:
FORFEITURE IMPOSED:
FIRST CLAIM:
FIRST CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FIRST CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIRST CLAIM:
SECOND CLAIM:
SECOND CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
SECOND CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SECOND CLAIM:
THIRD CLAIM:
THIRD CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
THIRD CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR THIRD CLAIM:
FOURTH CLAIM:
FOURTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FOURTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FOURTH CLAIM:
FIFTH CLAIM:
FIFTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FIFTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIFTH CLAIM:
SIXTH CLAIM:
SIXTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
SIXTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SIXTH CLAIM:
TOTAL AWARD:
APPEAL:
EXPLANATION OF APPEAL:
APPELLATE OPINION CITATION:Docket: 11-41097
HOLDING OF APPEALS COURT:
APPEAL STILL PENDING?:Yes
SUMMARY:Defendants brought 3 minors, aged 14, 15, and 17, 15 from Honduras into the United States, promising them work at a restaurant and $700/week pay. Once within the United States, the victims were forced to work at a bar, 10 hours a day, 6 days a week for $120/week--most of which was given over to the defendants to pay off the smuggling debt of $4,500. Defendants told the girls that they would make more money if they had sex with the customers, and could keep the money they made from prostitution, minus a $50 fee to be paid to Defendants.
Approval Status:Approved
Approver Comments:
            
EDIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan Law Wordmark Print View