Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Skip Navigation LinksHome > Centers & Programs > Program in Refugee and Asylum Law > Colloquium and Michigan Guidelines

Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law and the Michigan Guidelines

 Video: Preview of the Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law

VIDEO: View a preview of the Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law.

The Program in Refugee and Asylum Law gives Michigan students the opportunity to play a direct part in reshaping the substance and structures of international refugee law. Every other year, the Program hosts the Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law, which brings leading academic experts and practitioners from around the world to Ann Arbor to identify a strategy for confronting a cutting-edge problem in refugee protection. The purpose of the Colloquium is to tackle one difficult issue via preparatory study and a three-day debate and policy formulation meeting, thus producing the Michigan Guidelines on that particular issue. Students are actively involved in the drafting of background research for the Colloquium through their enrollment in specialized seminars, and participate as colleagues with the invited experts, many of whom become lifelong friends and mentors.

The Colloquium has met eight times since 1999; the Eighth Colloquium on Challenges in International Refugee Law convened March 31-April 2, 2017, and looked at the right of refugees to freedom of movement. Participants included Marjoleine Zieck (Amsterdam Law School); Susan Glazebrook (Justice, Supreme Court of New Zealand); Yunsong (Bill) Huang (Sichuan University); Sarah Joseph (Monash University); Satvinder Juss (King's College London); and Nora Markard (Hamburg University.

Michigan Guidelines on the International Protection of Refugees, 1998-2007Michigan Guidelines

The Colloquium has produced eight sets of unanimously agreed Michigan Guidelines on cutting-edge concerns related to asylum and refugee law. The Guidelines are frequently cited by courts around the world and help shape the way judges, lawyers, and other decision-makers look at a refugee issue.

Michigan Guidelines on Refugee Freedom of Movement (2017) | French Developed an understanding of the right of refugees to freedom of movement - spanning the refugee journey from departure to seek protection to eventual return home if and when protection is restored - that synthesizes relevant norms of international refugee and human rights law.

Michigan Guidelines on Risk for Reasons of Political Opinion (2015) | French  Addressed the proper interpretation of "political opinion" in a manner that ensures both fidelity to international law and the continuing vitality of the Refugee Convention.

Michigan Guidelines on the Exclusion of International Criminals (2013) | French  | Spanish  Analyzed the circumstances in which persons who have committed crimes against humanity and other international offenses are to be excluded from refugee protection.

Michigan Guidelines on the Right to Work (2009) Addressed the right to work for refugees, including those seeking asylum, in the country of arrival.

Michigan Guidelines on Protection Elsewhere (2 0 06) | Arabic | French | Russian  Took up the question of the lawfulness of rules and procedures that purport to assign the responsibility to protect refugees to some country other than that in which the refugee has sought, or intends to seek, protection (e.g. "country of first arrival," "safe third country," and extraterritorial processing rules and practices.)

Michigan Guidelines on Well-Founded Fear (2004) | Arabic | French | Russian Addressed why the focus of this aspect of the refugee definition is fundamentally objective, even as it requires that account be taken of the particular circumstances of each applicant for refugee status.

Michigan Guidelines on Nexus to a Convention Ground (2001) | Arabic | French | Russian  Defined the meaning and application of the "for reasons of" clause in the Convention refugee definition.

Michigan Guidelines on the Internal Protection Alternative (1999) | Arabic  | French | Russian  Determined under what circumstances state parties to the Convention and Protocol may lawfully compel a refugee claimant to seek or accept protection in a state not of his or her own choosing.

Michigan Law Wordmark Print View