Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content

Patrick McCaughn

Other Robbery Exonerations with Mistaken Witness ID
https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/PublishingImages/Lake_County_IL.png
In 1996, two Illinois women — one in Vernon Hills, on May 30, and the other in Lake Forest, on August 22 — were robbed at gunpoint of their wedding rings.  Patrick McCaughn was charged with the crimes after both victims identified him from a police photo array.
 
After McCaughn’s arrest on August 27, 1996, three nearly identical robberies occurred in the same areas, but Lake County prosecutors nonetheless proceeded with the case against McCaughn.  At his trial, his public defender argued that the post-arrest robberies created reasonable doubt about McCaughn’s guilt.  The prosecution countered that those crimes could have been copycats, given that the first two crimes had been extensively publicized.  On December 19, 1996, the jury accepted the prosecution theory and found McCaughn guilty.  
 
At McCaughn’s sentencing hearing, however, the judge vacated the conviction and granted McCaughn a new trial because the jury had considered inadmissible evidence: During deliberations, a juror had removed opaque tape from the bottom of McCaughn’s photo, revealing a prior arrest.
 
McCaughn waived a jury for his retrial, but was found guilty at a bench trial on April 1, 1997. He was sentenced to 12 years in prison on June 12, 1997.  The conviction was reversed on appeal based on ineffective assistance of his defense counsel. 
 
As McCaughn awaited his third trial, a man named John Zurawski, was arrested in Arizona and confessed that he had committed all five Lake County wedding-ring robberies.  After satisfying themselves of Zurawski’s veracity, prosecutors dismissed the charges against McCaughn.
 
Rob Warden

Report an error or add more information about this case.

Posting Date:  Before June 2012
State:Illinois
County:Lake
Most Serious Crime:Robbery
Additional Convictions:
Reported Crime Date:1996
Convicted:1996
Exonerated:1999
Sentence:12 years
Race/Ethnicity:White
Sex:Male
Age at the date of reported crime:25
Contributing Factors:Mistaken Witness ID
Did DNA evidence contribute to the exoneration?:No