The University of Michigan Law School

         The University of Michigan Law School
 
HomeClinical ProgramsHuman Trafficking CasesCase Display

Case View

 Case Documents

There are no documents to display for this case.

 Case Links - links to external documents

Link to Document

 
Case Details

  
CASE NAME:The People v. Andres P. Castillo
ALL PLAINTIFFS:The People
ALL DEFENDANTS:Andres P. Castillo
CITATION:
DOCKET NUMBER:
SOURCE:Lexis Search, News Article, Non-DOJ Press Release
TYPE OF CASE:Criminal
RELATED CASE CITATION:
TYPE OF TRIAL:Jury
TRIAL JUDGE(S):Charlene Padovani Mitchell
YEAR OF ARREST:2005
YEAR OF VERDICT:2007
TYPE OF COURT:State Court
STATE:California
FEDERAL DISTRICT:
STATE COUNTY:San Francisco County
AGE OF VICTIM(S):Adult
NUMBER OF VICTIMS:
GENDER OF VICTIM(S):Female
VICTIM'S COUNTRY OF ORIGIN:
METHOD OF ENTRY INTO THE U.S.:
WAS VICTIM CHARGED WITH A CRIME:
NUMBER OF DEFENDANT(S):1
GENDER OF DEFENDANT(S):Male
TYPE OF INDUSTRY:Sex
CASE CATEGORIZATION:Commercial Sexual Exploitation/Prostitution
FIRST CHARGE:Forcible rape
FIRST CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (a)(2
FIRST CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
FIRST CHARGE SENTENCE:
SECOND CHARGE:Forcible oral copulation
SECOND CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:Pen. Code § 288a, subd. (c)(2)
SECOND CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
SECOND CHARGE SENTENCE:
THIRD CHARGE:Misdemeanor battery
THIRD CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:Pen. Code § 242
THIRD CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
THIRD CHARGE SENTENCE:
FOURTH CHARGE:Simple kidnapping; sexual battery
FOURTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:Pen. Code § 207; Pen. Code § 243.4, subd. (a)
FOURTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
FOURTH CHARGE SENTENCE:
FIFTH CHARGE:False imprisonment
FIFTH CHARGE US/STATE CODE CITATION:Pen. Code § 236
FIFTH CHARGE VERDICT/PLEA:Guilty Verdict
FIFTH CHARGE SENTENCE:
CORE TERMS:
SENTENCING OPINION CITATION:
LENGTH OF GREATEST SENTENCE:982
RESTITUTION REQUIRED:
FINE IMPOSED:
FORFEITURE IMPOSED:
FIRST CLAIM:
FIRST CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FIRST CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIRST CLAIM:
SECOND CLAIM:
SECOND CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
SECOND CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SECOND CLAIM:
THIRD CLAIM:
THIRD CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
THIRD CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR THIRD CLAIM:
FOURTH CLAIM:
FOURTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FOURTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FOURTH CLAIM:
FIFTH CLAIM:
FIFTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
FIFTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR FIFTH CLAIM:
SIXTH CLAIM:
SIXTH CLAIM US/STATE CODE CITATION:
SIXTH CLAIM RESULT:
DAMAGES AWARDED FOR SIXTH CLAIM:
TOTAL AWARD:
APPEAL:Yes
EXPLANATION OF APPEAL:
APPELLATE OPINION CITATION:2010 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 7360
HOLDING OF APPEALS COURT:Sentence vacated and remanded
APPEAL STILL PENDING?:
SUMMARY:Victim worked as a prostitute, advertising in the SF Weekly as an "escort, massage service."  Victim had arranged to meet a client via telephone and rang the doorbell.  Castillo called to victim from across the street, suggesting they do it in his car.  Victim refused, and Castillo grabbed her hair, dragged her forty feet, raped her three times, threatened her with a knife, put some money in her pocket, then took it back, saying "No, I want to be your pimp."  The appellate court vacated the sentence and remanded the case for re-sentencing.  
Approval Status:Approved
Approver Comments:
            
EDIT

 

 

 

 

 

 

Michigan Law Wordmark Print View